#infoAnarchy Chump Archives for 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006

Richard Stallman on P2P
posted by coderman at 2006-02-08 21:37

A LOW-FAT diet does not cut health risks, so eat what you will, says the largest-ever study done to determine whether a low-fat diet reduces the risk of cancer and heart disease.
posted by qEd at 2006-02-08 21:30

qEd: Eat up fatties!

Uncle Sam Tracks Open Sources
posted by coderman at 2006-02-08 19:21

coderman: aww yeah, code munkies are the new rock star!
coderman: lol
coderman: sorry, just had to say it. perhaps if most of us weren't pasty white and horribly unfit
uid0: for the last time, codermange, stop trying to attract groupies

OpenZoep: An Open Source VoIP Engine
posted by coderman at 2006-02-08 19:04

coderman: aww yeah, a little crypto and this looks tasty!
coderman: "OpenZoep itself is entirely written in C++. The C/C++ API enables easy binding to other languages like Perl, Ruby, C#, or Visual Basic. As of January 2006, it is available for the Windows OS. Porting to OS X and Linux is underway, but OpenZoep can use your help here."

http://www.street-conflicts.com/index.php?refferer=4
posted by Amadillo at 2006-02-08 12:25

C-Keen: yet another online timesink^Wgame
C-Keen: a complete waste of time. ignore. avoid....
fridge: Whats the one thing worse than spam? German Spam!

http://www.scroogle.org/scraper.html
posted by j_blogs at 2006-02-08 11:58

People all fucked up. News at 11.
posted by j_blogs at 2006-02-08 08:50

The Rude Pundit on the cartoon situation. A good read, and not merely because it is not work-safe.
posted by seti at 2006-02-08 03:41

|337jesus is a lame nick
posted by Ash at 2006-02-08 03:34

Ash: yep it shore is

(Guardian UK) Women on the edge of destruction
posted by seti at 2006-02-08 03:28

neat ADSL2+ modem that can also handle POTS and VoATM in the same box
posted by seti at 2006-02-08 03:24

(Feb 4) The US government actually dared to criticise the Danish government for supporting a free press in Denmark
posted by seti at 2006-02-08 03:20

j_blogs: Well shit .. if you want to stick to absolute ideals, the protestors have as much right to protest and burn whatever they want as the publisher has to publish the cartoon. Now wanna talk about what's reasonable in terms of free speech? To me its censorship if I can't say something important, it would be better if people did not say someting trivial and widely highly offensive just to try to prove they can say it because 'they believe in
j_blogs: ideals'. Get fucked.
j_blogs: and for laney, here is a snap of your Mum I took the other day ... I know you didn't mean any offense, but then neither do I .. this is a balancing right of reply on behalf of those who luckily do not read this blog...
j_blogs: re chump some days ago, I'm not going to link to it.
j_blogs: trivial and deliberately highly offensive .. published for no reason than to offend.
j_blogs: I mean, sure shit I've probably done the same myself. But accept responsibility in some measure for the outcome, and ask if it's what you want, or should you maybe have done things differently, and therefore do you simply apologise humbly? Or do you go on drawing cartoons to bait?
j_blogs: (now i'm ranting about the original cartoons, not about laney)
j_blogs: What do you want? We should protect you now? Go and read the Darwin Awards. I so thought Denmark was gonna win.
j_blogs: Man racial taunts are just so stupid
j_blogs: btw that article seems to show the US govt criticising the publishers, not criticisin the danish govt as seti claims. They seem to be saying, "can't you please act responsibly?", not "thou shalt not publish".