#infoAnarchy Chump Archives for 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006RSS

last updated at 2006-02-25 22:49

evil will always triumph, because good is dumb

http://reviews.designtechnica.com/guide46.html
posted by lllllllll at 2006-02-25 21:29

lllllllll: "The Best of Web 2.0"

Killing TIA publicly just removed all the privacy preserving technology research associated with it
posted by coderman at 2006-02-25 17:38

coderman: thus driving all the invasive data mining and massive surveillance aspects into deep black beyond scruitiny or meaningful oversight

Taking Spying to Higher Level, Agencies Look for More Ways to Mine Data
posted by coderman at 2006-02-25 16:59

coderman: "AT&T's database of 1.92 trillion phone calls"

<Iran> if the US strikes Iran, we will fucking bomb Dimona in Israel!
posted by coderman at 2006-02-25 10:46

coderman: the comments are the best part of this story. itchy trigger fingers? i'd not be so anxious for a painful suicide, thanks.

http://www.vsocial.com/video/?d=13259
posted by burtonator at 2006-02-25 06:29

Mac OS X 10.4.5 for Intel Cracked
posted by coderman at 2006-02-25 06:11

coderman: w00t, guess i will have a Mac sooner than i thought!

Computer Security Awareness Video Contest
posted by coderman at 2006-02-25 06:09

http://www.brainjams.org/wordpress/
posted by lllllllll at 2006-02-25 03:04

lllllllll: BrainJams tomorrow at Berkley
j_blogs: mmm tasty

The South Dakota Legislature on Friday approved a bill that would ban almost all abortions in a move that could set up a challenge to the national abortion standard set by the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe vs. Wade ruling.
posted by coderman at 2006-02-25 01:18

coderman: STOCK UP ON COAT HANGERS!
coderman: " The proposed law concludes that life begins at conception based on medical advances in the past three decades. It would ban abortions in almost all cases, including pregnancies that endanger the mother or that resulted from incest or rape."
coderman: now those little girls will have to have daddy's baby! way to go south dakota you fucking idiots

a whole lotta nothing
posted by coderman at 2006-02-25 01:14

Shock horror: Canadian Uni doesn't install pervasive WiFi
posted by bk at 2006-02-25 01:08

bk: I recommend foil hats
j_blogs: because scientists can't rule out health effects and most research is controlled by the industry at least in the case of mobi phones
j_blogs: and check out the linked major EU study
j_blogs: not much research on WiFi even though the power levels are much higher ... or I think on other RF risks such as laptops on lap etc
j_blogs: supposedly because there's no mechanism by which low powered microwaves could cause damage .. never heard of the precautionary principle?
j_blogs: even when you need to use cellphones/wifi, there are ways to reduce risk
j_blogs: note especially that using these devices inside vehicles is way stupid unless you put the antenna outside ..
j_blogs: and you know that PCs generate a bunch of RF interference, so using them in vehicles is also quetionable when you have no need

Crazy underground marijuana growing facility.
posted by Mutiny at 2006-02-25 00:34

    
Run by the Daily Chump bot.