#facestab chump Archives for 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008RSS

last updated at 2009-02-23 21:34

Best CS geek pun ever

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:MIT_Nanotube_Super_Capacitor

cheezn8r: can be charged as fast as you can pump current through an I-beam
cheezn8r: and can deliver that current as fast as you like
cheezn8r: reader comment hits the mark: We just need to make sure the nanotubes stay inside the battery and don't get out like asbestos and act like a carcinogen.
cheezn8r: but recall that brake pads are asbestos already, so the challenge can't be too hard
nene: Brake pads haven't been made of asbestos in the civilised world for some time
cheezn8r: oops .. that read comment was here
cheezn8r: oh asbestos has been deprecated but was still in use early this century and i don't know that crash sites were ever regarded as risk zones for asbestoses .. i guess fine aprticles released in a crash disperse fast enough that the risk they pose is negligable compared with the harm from the crash itself
cheezn8r: summary: car crash == bad anyway, what harm a few nanoparticles? supercapacitors would be sealed and survive all but the worst crashes or fires anyway
nene: Quite, but car crash does not currently mean "Major hazard to biological life"
nene: Other than the obvious ;)
cheezn8r: yes, other than the obvious hazard of death, car crash is completely harmless :)
cheezn8r: summary of the summary: fund this technology because it's the only thing i've seen in many years of interest, which has any chance of saving the planet while preserving a lifestyle anything like what we have today (in fact better, if the nanoparticles can be contained well)
nene: Currently a car crash is mostly harmless to people not directly involved in squishage
cheezn8r: i think chances of busting a capacitor by impact in a car crash are low .. and present technology such as petrol or lpg gas also are detrmintal to health (and carcinogenic) if the crash is energetic enough
cheezn8r: remember, petrol?

http://www.automanonline.org/

cheezn8r: WELCOME TO MY WEBSITE DEDICATED TO AUTOMAN!

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/aug2005/hous-a06.shtml

seti: !2005!

http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php?func=newsdesc&news_no=591

cheezn8r: the english is poor, but i think they're saying that this heatsink/fan uses the CPU waste heat to drive a small stirling piston engine which powers the fan to cool the CPU ...
cheezn8r: i wonder if it makes a thrumming sound ... ?
cheezn8r: anyone have an envelope to figure out if that's even theoretically possible?
cheezn8r: animation
cheezn8r: i guess this can only be worth using when the CPU cooler fan power-use is only a fraction of the amount the CPU burns, ie it'd have to be a tiny efficiency measure or it wouldn't work
cheezn8r: and with the complication and i guess noise, i guess this is why in 1 year we haven't seen this for sale
cheezn8r: here is an equivalent idea for people with wood stoves, to blow the hot air around the room
cheezn8r: which sounds significantly more practical, especially because it isn't held together with rubber bands

Total: 4663

   

Run by the Daily Chump bot.