blows: amusingly, debian.org is now a spokespiece for Microsoft, viz blows: "UEFI Secure Boot is not an attempt by Microsoft to ..." blows: does someone from Microsoft work at debian.org? or did debian audit Microsoft's internal strategy email archive?
blows: via blows: the problem with secure boot signing, ie false sense of security since there are inevitably glitches and errors, and anyway, remember, someone may have compromised (one of the) signing keys ... ? blows: still, generally a good practice for assisting with remote management of PC/OS blows: just don't trust it blows: essentially, none of the 'stakeholders' in these security games demonstrate the slightest inkling of an attempt to actually create visibly secure software. blows: I just checked.
